Why Granular Data is Key to the Future of a Sustainable Food Industry?

April 30, 2024

As consumers grow increasingly concerned about the impacts of food production on the environment, the industry faces mounting pressure to justify its sustainability claims. Vague promises and generic data are no longer sufficient—credible proof through accurate measurement is now imperative. 

For food producers, this transition ushers in both challenges and opportunities. While scrutinizing production practices may be daunting initially, the insights obtained from rigorous assessments can inform smarter, more effective strategies for reducing climate footprints. Detailed, granular assessments empower individual producers to understand their unique impacts and capabilities—unlocking targeted solutions that benefit the planet and their productivity.

The Need for Credible Data

The food industry faces growing demands to justify sustainability claims with credible data. This pressure stems partly from past practices that allowed for liberal use of feel-good sustainability lingo without sufficient data to give such claims legitimacy. 

Interested in knowing more? 

Join our insightful webinar on "How Food Retailers and Brands Can Unlock Value using Farm-level Data." Learn practical strategies and real-world examples from expert speakers Heinz Flatnitzer and Markus Linder to help you leverage farm-level data for sustainable decision-making and business success.

Don't miss out on this opportunity to gain actionable insights and drive positive change in the food industry. Register now and secure your spot! 👇

🔗 Register Here: https://live.zoho.eu/ZNbdpndEi2 

To truly demonstrate meaningful improvement, food producers and grocery retailers must now provide concrete, measurable proof that their practices align with their sustainability rhetoric. This requires a commitment to transparency and quantifiable metrics, moving beyond nice-sounding but vague terminology. Credible third-party data and lifecycle analyses give much-needed validity to any sustainability initiatives undertaken.

The Value of Life Cycle Assessments (LCA)

One effective way to unlock the value of sustainability is by employing full Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of food products. LCA provides a thorough measurement of the environmental footprint of a food product by assessing impacts at each stage. This allows producers to pinpoint the specific areas where their footprint is highest. 

This approach makes the inefficiencies within an operation visible. Factors that lead to a high footprint are revealed, enabling targeted strategies for improvement. LCA serves as a diagnostic tool for the value chain itself. By facilitating data-driven insights, LCA allows producers to design effective interventions before implementation. 

Pinpointing Areas for Improvement

A high environmental footprint often signals inefficiencies within the farming system, or to show you a high impact product such as an animal-based one —factors that typically remain hidden unless rigorously examined through LCA. 

By making these inefficiencies visible, LCA facilitates the design of smart interventions before they are implemented, ensuring that these strategies are both effective in reducing footprints and beneficial for the farmers economically. For example, an LCA may reveal that a certain feed ingredient or manure management practice is responsible for a disproportionate amount of greenhouse gas emissions on the farm. Armed with this knowledge, the farmer can explore alternative approaches to reduce the impacts in this sustainability hotspot while still maintaining productivity and profitability.

The Limitations of Averages 

The reliance on average data can lead to assumptions that all farms have similar capabilities and needs regarding sustainability improvements. This oversimplification can lead to policies and practices that are either too broad to be effective or misaligned with the specific challenges faced by individual farms. For example, an average carbon footprint value applied across an entire region's dairy farms overlooks the differences between small family operations versus large concentrated animal feeding operations. The former may rely more on grazing and have minimal transport emissions, while the latter may depend on cultivated feed and have higher energy demands for housing, ventilation, etc. Applying the same carbon policies and reduction targets to both would be misguided. Each farm has its own constraints and opportunities that sustainability initiatives must take into account. Otherwise, the solutions proposed may be unrealistic or fail to capitalize on farm-specific circumstances. Relying solely on generic industry-level data can thus hinder real progress in shrinking animal agriculture's environmental footprint. 

The Diversity of Farms

The agricultural industry encompasses a wide range of different species, production systems, and geographical regions—all factors that contribute to differing sustainability needs and solutions. For example, an egg farm may utilize an open pasture system, while a cattle feedlot relies on an intensive grain-finishing process. The sustainability priorities between these two systems would vary greatly. 

From temperature control to waste management, the environmental considerations would be distinct. Even within the same species, sustainability challenges can differ significantly. The solutions that work for a large-scale broiler operation may not apply well to a smaller family chicken farm. 

These nuances demonstrate why average data fails to provide an accurate picture. With so many variables at play, farm-specific information is required to make informed choices and drive real change. To advance sustainability, the unique needs and capabilities of each individual farm must be taken into account.

The Need for Farm-Specific Data

To effectively reduce environmental impacts within the animal protein industry, sustainability strategies must be tailored to the individual farm. After all, the challenges and solutions for a beef cattle ranch in Argentina will be vastly different than those for a shrimp farm in Vietnam. 

Without precise measurement of impacts for each specific farm, producers miss out on crucial insights that enable custom sustainability plans. For example, an LCA may reveal that a particular dairy farm's largest environmental hotspot is manure management. Armed with this knowledge, the farmer can explore innovations like biodigesters to capture methane and generate renewable energy from the manure. 

Likewise, by monitoring farm-specific metrics over time, producers can clearly see the tangible effects of their sustainability efforts. Industry-average data simply cannot provide the level of transparency needed to drive real change.

Let's Collaborate on Your Scope 3 Emission Reduction!

At inoqo, we conduct product impact assessments for grocery retailers, F&B brands, and other food companies, calculating the climate, biodiversity, and social impact of all your food and beverage products. Reach out to us at hello@inoqo.com to explore how we can guide your business towards a low-impact future.

April 30, 2024

by Laura

from inoqo

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Share this on
Close

Get in touch

Thank you! We'll be in touch soon.

Close
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.